Grumpy and Grandma 740 Posted September 16, 2011 Report Share Posted September 16, 2011 Bye 450 hello Transit Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mouseketab.....Carol 1,261 Posted September 16, 2011 Report Share Posted September 16, 2011 Bye 450 hello TransitThat's too bad Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BouncingTiggers 98 Posted September 16, 2011 Report Share Posted September 16, 2011 There will be some sad carpenters & pipefitters at my company when that happens. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DaveInTN 3,247 Posted September 16, 2011 Report Share Posted September 16, 2011 First they killed off the Excursion several years back, and now the E-series? I know that I am not normal (in many many ways), but what is a guy supposed to drive that has a large family and wants to pull a heavy trailer? My E-350 fits the bill...12 passenger van, 1 ton configuration, beefy V-10 engine. It does the job quite well. 'Pickups don't work for me...not enough seating. I had a 2500 Burb, but when you load 'em up with 7 people plus the trailer tongue weight, even they are overloaded. Guess I'll be keeping my van until the kids are grown up. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Grumpy and Grandma 740 Posted September 16, 2011 Author Report Share Posted September 16, 2011 First they killed off the Excursion several years back, and now the E-series? I know that I am not normal (in many many ways), but what is a guy supposed to drive that has a large family and wants to pull a heavy trailer? My E-350 fits the bill...12 passenger van, 1 ton configuration, beefy V-10 engine. It does the job quite well. 'Pickups don't work for me...not enough seating. I had a 2500 Burb, but when you load 'em up with 7 people plus the trailer tongue weight, even they are overloaded. Guess I'll be keeping my van until the kids are grown up.Room for 1 more! :rofl2: Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DaveInTN 3,247 Posted September 16, 2011 Report Share Posted September 16, 2011 Room for 1 more! :rofl2:Uh, no thank you! And that seating configuration to me is no better than a large SUV. And I could be wrong, but I don't think the Transit vans have anywhere near the payload and towing capacity of the E-series. Like the Sprinter, I guess they are all about moving people or delivering packages more efficiently. Which fits the needs of probably 70% or more of E-series customers. But not all. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Grumpy and Grandma 740 Posted September 16, 2011 Author Report Share Posted September 16, 2011 Uh, no thank you! And that seating configuration to me is no better than a large SUV. And I could be wrong, but I don't think the Transit vans have anywhere near the payload and towing capacity of the E-series. Like the Sprinter, I guess they are all about moving people or delivering packages more efficiently. Which fits the needs of probably 70% or more of E-series customers. But not all.Maybe they'll beef it up and add a Powerstroke. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
LONE-STAR 370 Posted September 16, 2011 Report Share Posted September 16, 2011 Dave ther are always options it's just how deep are your pockets. These people can put you in a truck http://www.customautosbytim.com/ Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ftwildernessguy 778 Posted September 16, 2011 Report Share Posted September 16, 2011 Just throw some pillows in the bed of a pickup and the girls will be fine. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DaveInTN 3,247 Posted September 16, 2011 Report Share Posted September 16, 2011 Just throw some pillows in the bed of a pickup and the girls will be fine.My first trip to the Fort, for Christmas 1978, we rode in the back of my Dad's pickup from Silver Creek, NY to Florida. It had a cap on it, and my dad layed down shag carpet and beanbag chairs, and rigged a 12volt tv up so we could play our Pong game. I'm not positive, but I don't think the beanbag chairs had seatbelts. :rofl2: Hey, it was a different world then. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DaveInTN 3,247 Posted September 16, 2011 Report Share Posted September 16, 2011 Dave ther are always options it's just how deep are your pockets. These people can put you in a truck http://www.customautosbytim.com/I've looked at their builds before. Nice stuff, but I haven't hit the lottery yet. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
LONE-STAR 370 Posted September 16, 2011 Report Share Posted September 16, 2011 I've looked at their builds before. Nice stuff, but I haven't hit the lottery yet.I always wanted to call them and find out what they would charge to add a extended cab to my crew cab. But man my truck would be long. I am sure it's not cheap. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
wak648...Bill 94 Posted September 16, 2011 Report Share Posted September 16, 2011 I think that Ford is just trying to play catch up here. They are losing in leaps and bounds to the Dodge/Mercedes Sprinters in the utility van market. While the Sprinters are ugly, thhey very versatile in how they can be modified and still get an average of 20 mph in their deisel chasis. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
polkadotsuitcase 12 Posted September 16, 2011 Report Share Posted September 16, 2011 My first trip to the Fort, for Christmas 1978, we rode in the back of my Dad's pickup from Silver Creek, NY to Florida. It had a cap on it, and my dad layed down shag carpet and beanbag chairs, and rigged a 12volt tv up so we could play our Pong game. I'm not positive, but I don't think the beanbag chairs had seatbelts. :rofl2: Hey, it was a different world then. Love this! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DaveInTN 3,247 Posted September 16, 2011 Report Share Posted September 16, 2011 I think that Ford is just trying to play catch up here. They are losing in leaps and bounds to the Dodge/Mercedes Sprinters in the utility van market. While the Sprinters are ugly, thhey very versatile in how they can be modified and still get an average of 20 mph in their deisel chasis.I'm sure you're right. And now Nissan has also entered that market...with just about the ugliest van in history IMO. But no diesel option yet for the Nissan, so it will be interesting to see if Ford offers that in the US like they do in Europe and pretty much everywhere else. If not, both Ford and Nissan will have a hard time overtaking the Sprinter. Either way, I don't think any of those vans will match the payload capacities of my E-350. At least GM is still building their big vans for now, as far as I know. And they again are offering a diesel in theirs. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Keylime359 2 Posted September 16, 2011 Report Share Posted September 16, 2011 I'm sure you're right. And now Nissan has also entered that market...with just about the ugliest van in history IMO. But no diesel option yet for the Nissan, so it will be interesting to see if Ford offers that in the US like they do in Europe and pretty much everywhere else. If not, both Ford and Nissan will have a hard time overtaking the Sprinter. Either way, I don't think any of those vans will match the payload capacities of my E-350. At least GM is still building their big vans for now, as far as I know. And they again are offering a diesel in theirs.It's like they took a Nissan cube and a Honda element and had a baby. Then they beat it with an ugly stick. IMHO Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Roller ... aka Ed 351 Posted September 16, 2011 Report Share Posted September 16, 2011 I think that Ford is just trying to play catch up here. They are losing in leaps and bounds to the Dodge/Mercedes Sprinters in the utility van market. While the Sprinters are ugly, thhey very versatile in how they can be modified and still get an average of 20 mph in their deisel chasis.A lot of it has to do with World-Wide markets. The Transit is a big seller in Europe; the E-450 only sells in the US - and not very well; the solution is to convert the US to the Transit and simplify production by making the same models World-Wide ... at least that seems to be the way Ford is thinking. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
LONE-STAR 370 Posted September 16, 2011 Report Share Posted September 16, 2011 I wish we got all the diesel options like Europe. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bigdisneydaddy 9 Posted September 16, 2011 Report Share Posted September 16, 2011 we have 6 of them at work all 2009 models, I wont miss them at all. They are very hard to work on and even the basic maintenance like fuel filters requires that you remove several parts to have an extremely difficult access. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bigdisneydaddy 9 Posted September 16, 2011 Report Share Posted September 16, 2011 I wish we got all the diesel options like Europe.I already have my salesman watching for the availability of the Chevy Cruze diesel. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
LONE-STAR 370 Posted September 16, 2011 Report Share Posted September 16, 2011 I already have my salesman watching for the availability of the Chevy Cruze diesel.I want a diesel jeep wrangler Quote Link to post Share on other sites
LONE-STAR 370 Posted September 16, 2011 Report Share Posted September 16, 2011 we have 6 of them at work all 2009 models, I wont miss them at all. They are very hard to work on and even the basic maintenance like fuel filters requires that you remove several parts to have an extremely difficult access.I love ford trucks but when it comes to vans GM is the way to go. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ftwildernessguy 778 Posted September 16, 2011 Report Share Posted September 16, 2011 we have 6 of them at work all 2009 models, I wont miss them at all. They are very hard to work on and even the basic maintenance like fuel filters requires that you remove several parts to have an extremely difficult access.That was always my complaint with my GMC van. Maintenance costs were outrageous due to the labor involved. I had a leaky freeze out plug once and it cost me over 100 dollars to replace a 75 cent part. Anytime anything was done, it involved tearing apart the inside of the van to remove the cowl since access through the hood was non existant. In the case of the plug, the engine had to be pulled because the plug was behind a mount. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bigdisneydaddy 9 Posted September 16, 2011 Report Share Posted September 16, 2011 That was always my complaint with my GMC van. Maintenance costs were outrageous due to the labor involved. I had a leaky freeze out plug once and it cost me over 100 dollars to replace a 75 cent part. Anytime anything was done, it involved tearing apart the inside of the van to remove the cowl since access through the hood was non existant. In the case of the plug, the engine had to be pulled because the plug was behind a mount.I dread the time when we have to start replacing alternators, belts and idlers, I dont have a clue how we are ever going to get to them. I notice the techs at the Ford dealer dont exactly run out and give you a hug when you bring in an E series truck, the more likely scenario is that the low seniority guy gets stuck with it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DaveInTN 3,247 Posted September 16, 2011 Report Share Posted September 16, 2011 I saw some awesome small diesels in Russia, including the new generation of Ford Rangers. That was a great looking little truck. We saw diesel powered minivans, small cars, small SUVs, you name it. None of them available here except for a handful of VW's.Oh, and quit dissing my van. Keep it up and me and Larry will run you over. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.