BradyBzLyn...Mo 2,023 Posted October 5, 2017 Report Share Posted October 5, 2017 Quote Bob Iger Plans to Leave Disney in 2019 -- Really, This Time The CEO reaffirmed he will leave the company in July 2019, when his contract expires. Disney extended it in March after a succession plan unraveled last year. Leon Lazaroff Oct 4, 2017 11:02 AM EDT Walt Disney Co. (DIS - Get Report) CEO Bob Iger says he's going to leave the world's largest entertainment company in 2019. Really. He's serious this time. "This time I mean it," Iger said on Tuesday, Oct. 3, in Los Angeles at a media industry conference hosted by Vanity Fair. Iger's firm affirmation that he will leave Disney in an official capacity in roughly two years when his contract expires is sure to set the Disney tea-leaf watchers into a frenzy. Much speculation for his successor will undoubtedly fall on Disney's division heads, starting with Ben Sherwood, who runs its media networks group along with ESPN president John Skipper. Given that the biggest questions confronting Disney revolve around its television businesses, Sherwood's experience would seem to put him high in the running. Sherwood also is said to be well-liked by Iger. Others candidates within Disney are likely to include Bob Chapek, who runs the company's theme parks and resorts operation, as well as Kevin Mayer, the company's chief strategist. Mayer's lack of operating experience, though, is likely to make him a long shot. Iger, 66, by comparison, was president of ABC Television and later chief operating officer of Capital Cities/ABC Inc. before it was acquired by Disney in 1996. Iger was elevated to the same position at Disney in 2000 before succeeding Michael Eisner in 2005. Eisner was forced out of Disney following Roy Disney's successful shareholder revolt. Others likely to get mention as Iger's successor include Facebook Inc. (FB - Get Report) COO Sheryl Sandberg, a member of Disney's board since 2010. Her lack of operational experience running a television or film business is likely to work against her, but she doesn't lack for fame and a reputation for competence. Suffice it to say there are few secrets that are kept as tightly as Disney's succession plans. In the months following the April 2016 sacking of Iger's heir apparent, Tom Staggs, Disney's board declined to say whether it had decided on someone else or whether the former theme parks division head had become frustrated that a final decision about succession hadn't been made. Iger was given a contract extension in March, accepting a $5 million bonus to remain atop Disney until July 2019. Iger also will serve as a consultant for three years after that, receiving $500,000 for each of the first eight quarters and $250,000 for the last four in exchange for access to his "unique skills, knowledge and experience with regard to the media and entertainment business." Until then, Iger has a lot of work to do. Chief among them will be to negotiate new carriage agreements with pay-TV operators covering about 50% of its total subscribers. On Sunday, Disney proved that its networks still remain critical to cable TV subscribers. Altice USA Inc. (ATUS) was forced to accept an increased fee for ESPN, ABC and other networks. No doubt the emergence of new digital pay-TV platforms such as Sling TV from Dish Network Corp. (DISH - Get Report) means that cable providers risk customer churn if they spurn ESPN. Iger on Tuesday also underscored what he has said in the past: that Disney may eventually sell ESPN directly to consumers, forgoing the need to pass its network through pay-TV operators. That, of course, is a ways off. For all its fraying, the traditional pay-TV bundle remains a formidable business. Just ask Comcast Corp. (CMCSA - Get Report) and Charter Communications Inc. (CHTR - Get Report) . Nonetheless, Iger said the new ESPN-branded streaming service to launch early next year will include some 10,000 live events a year. That number seems ridiculously high, but it is certain to give Disney a lot of information about how best to manage ESPN in the future. Iger also mentioned that while the company considered acquiring Twitter Inc. (TWTR - Get Report) , it ultimately chose to take a majority stake in BAMTech LLC, the streaming technology business launched by Major League Baseball that will run Disney's full range of digital platforms. https://www.thestreet.com/story/14329918/1/disney-will-need-to-replace-ceo-iger-in-2019.html Tri-Circle-D 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Walt Disney Co. (DIS - Get Report) CEO Bob Iger says he's going to leave the world's largest entertainment company in 2019. Really. He's serious this time. "This time I mean it," Iger said on Tuesday, Oct. 3, in Los Angeles at a media industry conference hosted by Vanity Fair. Iger's firm affirmation that he will leave Disney in an official capacity in roughly two years when his contract expires is sure to set the Disney tea-leaf watchers into a frenzy. Much speculation for his successor will undoubtedly fall on Disney's division heads, starting with Ben Sherwood, who runs its media networks group along with ESPN president John Skipper. Given that the biggest questions confronting Disney revolve around its television businesses, Sherwood's experience would seem to put him high in the running. Sherwood also is said to be well-liked by Iger. Others candidates within Disney are likely to include Bob Chapek, who runs the company's theme parks and resorts operation, as well as Kevin Mayer, the company's chief strategist. Mayer's lack of operating experience, though, is likely to make him a long shot. Iger, 66, by comparison, was president of ABC Television and later chief operating officer of Capital Cities/ABC Inc. before it was acquired by Disney in 1996. Iger was elevated to the same position at Disney in 2000 before succeeding Michael Eisner in 2005. Eisner was forced out of Disney following Roy Disney's successful shareholder revolt. Others likely to get mention as Iger's successor include Facebook Inc. (FB - Get Report) COO Sheryl Sandberg, a member of Disney's board since 2010. Her lack of operational experience running a television or film business is likely to work against her, but she doesn't lack for fame and a reputation for competence. Suffice it to say there are few secrets that are kept as tightly as Disney's succession plans. In the months following the April 2016 sacking of Iger's heir apparent, Tom Staggs, Disney's board declined to say whether it had decided on someone else or whether the former theme parks division head had become frustrated that a final decision about succession hadn't been made. Iger was given a contract extension in March, accepting a $5 million bonus to remain atop Disney until July 2019. Iger also will serve as a consultant for three years after that, receiving $500,000 for each of the first eight quarters and $250,000 for the last four in exchange for access to his "unique skills, knowledge and experience with regard to the media and entertainment business." Until then, Iger has a lot of work to do. Chief among them will be to negotiate new carriage agreements with pay-TV operators covering about 50% of its total subscribers. On Sunday, Disney proved that its networks still remain critical to cable TV subscribers. Altice USA Inc. (ATUS) was forced to accept an increased fee for ESPN, ABC and other networks. No doubt the emergence of new digital pay-TV platforms such as Sling TV from Dish Network Corp. (DISH - Get Report) means that cable providers risk customer churn if they spurn ESPN. Iger on Tuesday also underscored what he has said in the past: that Disney may eventually sell ESPN directly to consumers, forgoing the need to pass its network through pay-TV operators. That, of course, is a ways off. For all its fraying, the traditional pay-TV bundle remains a formidable business. Just ask Comcast Corp. (CMCSA - Get Report) and Charter Communications Inc. (CHTR - Get Report) . Nonetheless, Iger said the new ESPN-branded streaming service to launch early next year will include some 10,000 live events a year. That number seems ridiculously high, but it is certain to give Disney a lot of information about how best to manage ESPN in the future. Iger also mentioned that while the company considered acquiring Twitter Inc. (TWTR - Get Report) , it ultimately chose to take a majority stake in BAMTech LLC, the streaming technology business launched by Major League Baseball that will run Disney's full range of digital platforms.
Tri-Circle-D 2,059 Posted October 5, 2017 Report Share Posted October 5, 2017 Thanks for sharing. I'm not a big fan of Iger, because I think he has used the park operations to fund all the things that are a drain on the company, not to mention that he gets paid too much. But, Disney apparently has some big problems on the horizon, mainly from owning and operating ESPN. That's a big mess that someone will need to solve. I'm guessing it will be the next guy, and not Iger, who ultimately will have to deal with it. TCD Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Travisma 1,317 Posted October 5, 2017 Report Share Posted October 5, 2017 31 minutes ago, Tri-Circle-D said: Thanks for sharing. I'm not a big fan of Iger, because I think he has used the park operations to fund all the things that are a drain on the company, not to mention that he gets paid too much. But, Disney apparently has some big problems on the horizon, mainly from owning and operating ESPN. That's a big mess that someone will need to solve. I'm guessing it will be the next guy, and not Iger, who ultimately will have to deal with it. TCD I wonder what the original core group of leaders would think of how the company operates today? Back then they were concerned about what ideas Disney company themselves came up with. I don't think they were worried about taking over things that they themselves didn't come up with like Warner Brothers, etc. What does ESPN have to do with the core values that is Disney? Same with Marvel, Star Wars, and to a certain extent The Muppets (at least they are kid friendly). I could see the logic in expending the Disney brand into the modern age of digital content, etc, but they should've just expanded their own brand instead of taking over everyone else. Competition is good for business! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Tri-Circle-D 2,059 Posted October 5, 2017 Report Share Posted October 5, 2017 29 minutes ago, Travisma said: I wonder what the original core group of leaders would think of how the company operates today? The original Disney management would not recognize what Disney has become. But, the same thing can no doubt be said about every Fortune 500 company that existed 50 years ago and still exists today. A lot of them are already gone. The times have drastically changed. Everything is now driven by pure, unmitigated, blind greed. Nothing else matters to them. And that's why companies like Disney are in the messes that they're in. Greed has been the cause of death of many companies in the past 50 years, and it very well be the cause of Disney's death as well. Thousands, maybe millions, of folks will lose a lot as a result, but the guys and gals who are piloting the planes into the ground will jump out with their golden parachutes and live out their lives with more wealth than they can ever possibly spend. TCD fladogfan aka Gretchen and lightbikes 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lightbikes 73 Posted October 5, 2017 Report Share Posted October 5, 2017 2 hours ago, Tri-Circle-D said: Everything is now driven by pure, unmitigated, blind greed. Nothing else matters to them. And that's why companies like Disney are in the messes that they're in. Well said !!!!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Starbuc71 162 Posted October 6, 2017 Report Share Posted October 6, 2017 Someone posted this on FB and I replied," thank the maker. Maybe they will hire someone who will follow walts Dream and make the parks for every child and adult (who can afford it)". I got semi blasted by a Disney freak who tried to explain big business to me and she ended her reply with," you can't blame Iger for the condition of the parks, he's an executive and doesn't spend time in the parks. He has more important things to take care of and works from his office. That's why he has managers." What a dumb a**. I'm with TCD on this lightbikes 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Travisma 1,317 Posted October 6, 2017 Report Share Posted October 6, 2017 9 hours ago, Starbuc71 said: Someone posted this on FB and I replied," thank the maker. Maybe they will hire someone who will follow walts Dream and make the parks for every child and adult (who can afford it)". I got semi blasted by a Disney freak who tried to explain big business to me and she ended her reply with," you can't blame Iger for the condition of the parks, he's an executive and doesn't spend time in the parks. He has more important things to take care of and works from his office. That's why he has managers." What a dumb a**. I'm with TCD on this Sounds like my organization. Don't tell the manager that things are going down the crapper, she has more important things to take care of... like telecoms all day long further tying up her managers so they can't manage either! lightbikes 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
keith_h 420 Posted October 6, 2017 Report Share Posted October 6, 2017 1 hour ago, Travisma said: Sounds like my organization. Don't tell the manager that things are going down the crapper, she has more important things to take care of... like telecoms all day long further tying up her managers so they can't manage either! I was fortunate that I had old timers for most of my managers. They had no problem with admitting that my company had changed and it wasn't for the better. Like many companies employees became resources, risk taking declined and milking the cash cows became the norm. If customers complained that was ok as long as it was't so much that they went to a competitor. lightbikes 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
fladogfan aka Gretchen 259 Posted October 9, 2017 Report Share Posted October 9, 2017 And all that money going to the top people is made off the backs of the lowly hourly workers. I worked there when WDW first started doing fire works every night at MK. Of course our wages were frozen at the time. Was real insulting to me that my nickel or dime raise was blowing up every night. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Travisma 1,317 Posted October 12, 2017 Report Share Posted October 12, 2017 On 10/9/2017 at 4:33 PM, fladogfan aka Gretchen said: And all that money going to the top people is made off the backs of the lowly hourly workers. I worked there when WDW first started doing fire works every night at MK. Of course our wages were frozen at the time. Was real insulting to me that my nickel or dime raise was blowing up every night. but at least it was benefitting the customers and not just going into a higher ups pocket! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Tuke 16 Posted October 12, 2017 Report Share Posted October 12, 2017 On 10/5/2017 at 1:57 PM, Travisma said: What does ESPN have to do with the core values that is Disney? Same with Marvel, Star Wars, and to a certain extent The Muppets (at least they are kid friendly). I could see the logic in expending the Disney brand into the modern age of digital content, etc, but they should've just expanded their own brand instead of taking over everyone else. Competition is good for business! I believe the answer is obvious, they (ESPN/Disney/ABC) are one in the same. And when you consider the recent Jemele Hill, the Weinsteins, Iger's presidential talk, shareholders' open protests, and ongoing daily examples of bias pervading Disney’s media outlets; anyone can see their core values more vividly than what's crafted between the PR and marketing departments. Add this all in to what in the least is a perceived decline in value and quality at Disney's theme parks among those most loyal and you have many looking for any option beyond ESPN/Disney/ABC. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Travisma 1,317 Posted October 12, 2017 Report Share Posted October 12, 2017 29 minutes ago, Tuke said: I believe the answer is obvious, they (ESPN/Disney/ABC) are one in the same. And when you consider the recent Jemele Hill, the Weinsteins, Iger's presidential talk, shareholders' open protests, and ongoing daily examples of bias pervading Disney’s media outlets; anyone can see their core values more vividly than what's crafted between the PR and marketing departments. Add this all in to what in the least is a perceived decline in value and quality at Disney's theme parks among those most loyal and you have many looking for any option beyond ESPN/Disney/ABC. I understand they are one in the same, but my question was why did they buy into these items that originally weren't part of their core products/values? I know business's like to expand, but what did a sports network have to do with Mickey Mouse? And this year they renamed the ABC Family network into FreeForm. Smart move on their part, because 99% of the shows on ABC Family were not very family friendly (at least not for younger kids) in a lot of peoples eyes. Expansions always cause growing pains, and don't necessarily pan out in monetary gains. All the money they are throwing at ESPN, could've gone to expanding the parks and bettering customers experiences. Instead the parks now have a lot of maintenance issues because of age and neglect, and are overcrowded just about any time you go. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Tuke 16 Posted October 12, 2017 Report Share Posted October 12, 2017 Now that is a very good question and one that cannot be answered IMO without taking into consideration Disney's long history but also that of the American family and Hollywood/Entertainment Industry. I don't believe its just due to becoming a conglomerate since there are some great benefits and examples there nor due to greed alone since some of the most greedy people and organizations are more often those without money and power. However, I will say in short that leaderships always are tempted into doing and becoming more vs. doing what they do best better. Unfortunately, in doing more; you often find yourself hitching your wagon to parties and agendas that you may not have once identified with. IMO this is why Disney's best days may be behind them. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.