DaveInTN 3,247 Posted October 18, 2014 Report Share Posted October 18, 2014 Skynet? :rofl3: I'm actually more afraid of MDE. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BradyBzLyn...Mo 2,023 Posted October 18, 2014 Report Share Posted October 18, 2014 :rofl3: I'm actually more afraid of MDE. How do you know MDE isn't Skynett? Think about it... a system designed to infiltrate every aspect of your life (at WDW) that has the ability to track your activities, run by a massive computer system in a major corporation that has already figured out how to take a picture of your soul... Hmmmmmmm?!?! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Roller ... aka Ed 351 Posted October 18, 2014 Report Share Posted October 18, 2014 MDE = Mickey's Devices of Evil Quote Link to post Share on other sites
devores 382 Posted October 18, 2014 Report Share Posted October 18, 2014 Another possibility to consider...If they are working on improving the WiFi around WDW, it's not necessarily just for Guests...There are tons of tablets being used by the front desks at the resorts, ticketing, and many, many other applications. They're used for things like activating tickets, cashiering for bar service, etc. CMs having trouble getting service on these would seem to be a much more pressing matter than how quickly Guests can access MDE.Umm. There is not a seperate network for these devices. We utilize the same network guests do to perform our jobs. The only exception is our devices have priority over a guest device. And the function of the device determins the priority it gets. When the park is packed, our uploads of the photos we take slow down due to increased network traffic. So improving the guest wifi will improve our wifi. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BradyBzLyn...Mo 2,023 Posted October 18, 2014 Report Share Posted October 18, 2014 Understood. My point was the possibility that Guest demand alone on the Wifi system would not be the only reason to beef it up. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BayLake Campers 83 Posted October 18, 2014 Report Share Posted October 18, 2014 Could it be the tracking of the RFID radios in the Magic bands? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
oft013 23 Posted October 18, 2014 Report Share Posted October 18, 2014 Many of the cellular providers are adding more towers and in many cases lowering their existing ones. This is to create smaller footprints for each cell tower. With the cell phones/ tablets becoming more data intensive the smaller footprint for each site helps to keep the site from being overwhelmed with data requests. Hopefully the additional sites cover the areas where the existing have been lowered. Once your wireless signal hits a cell tower, the signal gets combined with the other folks signal hitting the same tower. Then they usually leave the cell site over a copper or fiber optic network. That is usually where the bottleneck really occurs. So the more cell sites each getting hit with less data requests tends to decrease the bottleneck. BradyBzLyn...Mo 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BradyBzLyn...Mo 2,023 Posted October 19, 2014 Report Share Posted October 19, 2014 Could it be the tracking of the RFID radios in the Magic bands? See "Skynet" Many of the cellular providers are adding more towers and in many cases lowering their existing ones. This is to create smaller footprints for each cell tower. With the cell phones/ tablets becoming more data intensive the smaller footprint for each site helps to keep the site from being overwhelmed with data requests. Hopefully the additional sites cover the areas where the existing have been lowered. Once your wireless signal hits a cell tower, the signal gets combined with the other folks signal hitting the same tower. Then they usually leave the cell site over a copper or fiber optic network. That is usually where the bottleneck really occurs. So the more cell sites each getting hit with less data requests tends to decrease the bottleneck. And once again, I learn something new here! :) Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BayLake Campers 83 Posted October 19, 2014 Report Share Posted October 19, 2014 It's AT&T http://www.orlandosentinel.com/travel/attractions/the-daily-disney/os-atts-new-antenna-system-will-boost-cellular-coverage-at-walt-disney-world-20140309-story.html#page=1 BradyBzLyn...Mo 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BradyBzLyn...Mo 2,023 Posted October 19, 2014 Report Share Posted October 19, 2014 It's AT&T http://www.orlandosentinel.com/travel/attractions/the-daily-disney/os-atts-new-antenna-system-will-boost-cellular-coverage-at-walt-disney-world-20140309-story.html#page=1 Nice sleuthing!!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ftwildernessguy 778 Posted October 19, 2014 Report Share Posted October 19, 2014 It's the government spying on me. No worries. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Avatab.... Steve 124 Posted October 19, 2014 Report Share Posted October 19, 2014 From the article: “Everything had to be concealed,” Quant said. “As a parkgoer, you will never see any of the equipment.” and: "AT&T engineers and Disney Imagineers worked together to insure that resort guests wouldn’t see such glaring visual aberrations to the themed attractions at the park." Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Travisma 1,317 Posted October 19, 2014 Report Share Posted October 19, 2014 That article refers to small hidden repeater type antennas throughout the parks. Sprint set those up at some of our larger offices where cell coverage was poor.Those towers may be part of AT&T's commitment to better coverage, but they look like regular old towers, and like TCD said, why bother hiding them, it's only the Fort campers that see them and we aren't important. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DaveInTN 3,247 Posted October 19, 2014 Report Share Posted October 19, 2014 Maybe I'm misunderstanding where these towers were placed, but wouldn't they be visible to the Four Seasons' guests as well? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Avatab.... Steve 124 Posted October 19, 2014 Report Share Posted October 19, 2014 and like TCD said, why bother hiding them, it's only the Fort campers that see them and we aren't important. Yup. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Avatab.... Steve 124 Posted October 19, 2014 Report Share Posted October 19, 2014 Maybe I'm misunderstanding where these towers were placed, but wouldn't they be visible to the Four Seasons' guests as well? It looks like these are right next to the main FW road? If so, they might not be noticeable at all from the you-know-where.... If they are going to put any antennas near that other place you can bet your bytes they won't be as obtrusive as these! BradyBzLyn...Mo 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
LONE-STAR 370 Posted October 20, 2014 Report Share Posted October 20, 2014 Oh every body loves there phone towers are just part of it. It's just the time we live in Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Tri-Circle-D 2,059 Posted October 20, 2014 Author Report Share Posted October 20, 2014 It's AT&T http://www.orlandosentinel.com/travel/attractions/the-daily-disney/os-atts-new-antenna-system-will-boost-cellular-coverage-at-walt-disney-world-20140309-story.html#page=1 Good job, Warren. Maybe I'm misunderstanding where these towers were placed, but wouldn't they be visible to the Four Seasons' guests as well? It looks like these are right next to the main FW road? If so, they might not be noticeable at all from the you-know-where.... If they are going to put any antennas near that other place you can bet your bytes they won't be as obtrusive as these! I think the only reason these towers are as close to Ft. Wilderness Trail as they are is because of the Four Seasons. This is the view that they are marketing: The Fort is to the left, out of view in this photo. The cell towers are as far to the west and as far away from the Four Seasons as they could go without actually installing them in one of the loops. Yes, the towers are going to be visible from the Four Seasons- but the orientation of the hotel directs guests attention away from the Fort, and toward the MK view. Oh every body loves there phone towers are just part of it. It's just the time we live in OK. Then, maybe they should just put a couple up next to the pool and be done with it. TCD Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Travisma 1,317 Posted October 20, 2014 Report Share Posted October 20, 2014 One plus if you want to call it that, is that a lot of these towers are now owned by company that leases antennas out to the various cell companies. There might be 3 or 4 different carries on it. When cell phones first came on the scene each company was installing their own tower. Then municipalities started cracking down on tower placements, so these companies came into play. Some carriers still put up their own trying to win the coverage war over competitors. And then you have the carriers puting in the hidden small footprint ones like AT&T did at Disney. You can be sure they are paying a small fortune to Disney to be able to say they have the best coverage on property. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Grumpy and Grandma 740 Posted October 21, 2014 Report Share Posted October 21, 2014 While out looping I got to take a closer look at the two brown towers. Based on all the "spokes" sticking out at various angles up and down the poles I expect them to grow branches pretty soon. BradyBzLyn...Mo 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Tri-Circle-D 2,059 Posted October 21, 2014 Author Report Share Posted October 21, 2014 While out looping I got to take a closer look at the two brown towers. Based on all the "spokes" sticking out at various angles up and down the poles I expect them to grow branches pretty soon. Nice work. I'd love to see photos when and if the branches sprout. TCD Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Tri-Circle-D 2,059 Posted December 1, 2014 Author Report Share Posted December 1, 2014 Nice work. I'd love to see photos when and if the branches sprout. TCD Like they say, if you want it done right, do it yourself. Here you go: Here's a zoom on that suspicious looking tree in the center of that photo: The towers actually blend in pretty well. They're definitely not as tall as some of the others you see around WDW. TCD Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DaveInTN 3,247 Posted December 1, 2014 Report Share Posted December 1, 2014 Wow! That certainly blends in better than the fake palm on Castaway Cay. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Grumpy and Grandma 740 Posted December 1, 2014 Report Share Posted December 1, 2014 Like they say, if you want it done right, do it yourself.Here you go:Here's a zoom on that suspicious looking tree in the center of that photo:The towers actually blend in pretty well. They're definitely not as tall as some of the others you see around WDW.TCDThey were slow growing and didn't sprout until early November, but then DISNEY really fertilized and they took off. :rofl2: thdewey 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Helmsey......Todd 134 Posted December 1, 2014 Report Share Posted December 1, 2014 Interesting. I had to kinda look hard in that first pic to find it, better than I assumed it would be. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.